MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/comments/1su7f84/lois/ohzx43x/?context=3
r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/WithSkelly • Apr 24 '26
4.0k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
Whatever their findings, Id genuinely love to see their methodology lol
-5 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26 Do they have Google where you live? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043266/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661381000104X https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10844877/ 7 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 None of those support what your asserting. The second link is literally “page not found”. -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 4 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 Yeah, that doesn’t support what you were initially arguing…… -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics. 6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
-5
Do they have Google where you live?
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043266/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026661381000104X
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10844877/
7 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 None of those support what your asserting. The second link is literally “page not found”. -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 4 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 Yeah, that doesn’t support what you were initially arguing…… -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics. 6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
7
None of those support what your asserting. The second link is literally “page not found”.
-1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 4 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 Yeah, that doesn’t support what you were initially arguing…… -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics. 6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
-1
4 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 Yeah, that doesn’t support what you were initially arguing…… -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics. 6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
4
Yeah, that doesn’t support what you were initially arguing……
-1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics. 6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
My “argument” was only that this is something that has been studied and not purely the anecdotal observation of RNs. That is clearly true. I don’t have any strong position on the specifics.
6 u/OnlyAdvertisersKnoMe Apr 24 '26 I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion -1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
6
I think you have reading comprehension problems if you think that study is relevant to the initial discussion
-1 u/Young_Hickory Apr 24 '26 At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
At least I know the difference between “majority” and “common” and didn’t claim that no one has studied paternal attendance at births.
8
u/Aurrr-Naurrrr Apr 24 '26
Whatever their findings, Id genuinely love to see their methodology lol