r/PeterExplainsTheJoke • u/WithSkelly • Apr 24 '26

Meme needing explanation Lois?

Post image

​

28.3k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

4.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

14

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26

My guy, if you think that’s not the case, you 1) need to get out more, and 2) need to talk to women and medical professionals more. It happens more in some places and less in others, but there’s not a country on earth where it’s not a regular occurrence even where it’s not the majority.

And there are definitely lots of places where this is close to 100%.

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

Then prove it.

-5

u/SomeConfetti Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

They won't be able to. The amount of negative bullshit people are willing to believe when it's about men is astonishing.

Edit: reddit is so predictable, look u/whistleridge can have all the time in the world, and they won't be able to come up with the data because it's misandrist nonsense not based in reality. To every single one of you downvoting, I hope you all can get better and rejoin the rest of us in reality.

2

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26

…except I did, lol? At great length?

2

u/SomeConfetti Apr 24 '26

Would you mind linking the proof you already have then?

1

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26

It’s literally right there in reply to him, but sure.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/s/Cyaobg86xD

2

u/SomeConfetti Apr 24 '26

You can't be serious...

You think that your ass-pull rant is proof of anything?

1

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

Yep.

Which is why you aren’t able to engage even a single point of the substance of it, and are trying to dismiss it out of hand instead.

Edit: and last-commenting, name-calling, and blocking me deeeeeefinitely doesn’t disprove a thing I said lmao. Particularly not when you’re replying so quickly that there’s no possibility that you actually engaged any of the materials provided.

It does, however, do a lot to suggest that this person doesn’t know how to manage their emotions well when confronted with evidence that their pre-existing ideas might not be as solid as all that.

1

u/SomeConfetti Apr 24 '26

I thought you were misguided, but you're just a lonely person having fun stirring things up on reddit. Have a nice day.

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

So one person's shit experience is proof of a widespread and socialized behavior?

1

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26

No. It is an exemplar of a widespread and socialized behavior. The proof of it is the ample empirical evidence that I provided some examples of, plus some basic knowledge of human history and common sense.

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

You mean the ample and empirical evidence you've provided nothing off?

1

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26

Do feel free to actually engage those materials and to attempt to put together an actual argument showing where you think I’m wrong. And I will then happily annihilate it for you.

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

How can I engage when the material is based on "because I said so".

1

u/whistleridge Apr 24 '26 edited Apr 24 '26

lol. That’s what I expected. Both you and the other guy just don’t want to read.

But here. Yet again:

https://www.reddit.com/r/PeterExplainsTheJoke/s/Cyaobg86xD

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

If your definition of ample and empirical evidence is one person's testimony, you should stay in school.

1

u/SomeConfetti Apr 24 '26

Don't bother, it's just a troll, they love getting a rise out of people and wrestling in mud.

1

u/HendriXP88 Apr 24 '26

It really do seems like it.

→ More replies (0)